Benchmark: Apache2 vs. Lighttpd (Images)

Submitted by falko (Contact Author) (Forums) on Tue, 2008-10-14 12:00. :: Apache | Lighttpd

Benchmark: Apache2 vs. Lighttpd (Images)

Version 1.0
Author: Falko Timme <ft [at] falkotimme [dot] com>
Last edited 09/16/2008

This benchmark shows how Apache2 (version 2.2.3) and lighttpd (version 1.4.13) perform compared to each other when delivering an image file (jpg, about 25KB in size). This benchmark was created with the help of ab (Apache benchmark) on a VMware vm (Debian Etch); if you try this yourself, your numbers might differ (depending on your hardware), but the tendency should be the same.

 

Preliminary Note

I have tested this on a Debian Etch system with 512MB RAM inside a VMware vm on a system with an Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz (yes, quite old, but as I said in the introduction, the tendency should be the same on other hardware).

Apache 2.2.3 mpm-prefork with default Debian configuration.

Lighttpd 1.4.13 with default Debian configuration.

The image file is 25KB in size and called test.jpg.

I've run the following commands ten times each and calculated the average requests per second that the web server could handle:

ab -n 100 -c 5 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 1000 -c 5 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 10000 -c 5 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 100 -c 50 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 1000 -c 50 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 10000 -c 50 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 100 -c 100 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

ab -n 10000 -c 100 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

-n is the number of requests to perform for the benchmarking session; -c is the number of multiple requests to perform at a time.

 

ab -n 100 -c 5 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 540,14 requests/second

Lighttpd: 608,71 requests/second (+ 12,69%)

 

ab -n 1000 -c 5 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 1146,94 requests/second

Lighttpd: 1408,45 requests/second (+ 22,80%)

 

ab -n 10000 -c 5 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 2111,64 requests/second

Lighttpd: 2646,44 requests/second (+ 25,33%)

 

ab -n 100 -c 50 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 509,01 requests/second

Lighttpd: 551,21 requests/second (+ 8,29%)

 

ab -n 1000 -c 50 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 1095,03 requests/second

Lighttpd: 1282,62 requests/second (+ 17,13%)

 

ab -n 10000 -c 50 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 1816,61 requests/second

Lighttpd: 2266,33 requests/second (+ 24,76%)

 

ab -n 100 -c 100 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 484,80 requests/second

Lighttpd: 485,07 requests/second (+ 0,06%)

 

ab -n 1000 -c 100 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 1073,90 requests/second

Lighttpd: 1276,06 requests/second (+ 18,82%)

 

ab -n 10000 -c 100 http://192.168.0.100/test.jpg

Apache: 1729,61 requests/second

Lighttpd: 1985,28 requests/second (+ 14,78%)

 

Complete Graph


Please do not use the comment function to ask for help! If you need help, please use our forum.
Comments will be published after administrator approval.
Submitted by Michael (not registered) on Sat, 2008-12-20 09:46.

Apache has several threading models.  You used the slowest (and default on Debian).  Try looking at Debian modules "apache-mpm-worker" (a threaded implementation) or "apache-mpm-event" (a similar model to lighttpd).

"The worker MPM provides a thread implementation for Apache HTTPD. It is considerably faster than the traditional model, and is the recommended MPM."

 "The event-Multi-Processing Module (MPM) is designed to allow more requests to be served simultaneously by passing off some processing to work to supporting threads..... "

 The pre-fork model that you tested with is the "safest" but not the fastest (ie, not a danger for non-thread safe libraries).

Submitted by mdani (not registered) on Wed, 2008-10-15 04:53.

Hi Falko. Nice Article.

When you do the test, is that between test to another test you do a restart the apache/lighty, i guest it would make a different change.. :)

Submitted by bennos (not registered) on Tue, 2008-10-14 14:53.
this is not a typical benchmark. You used just a JPG File. This is more a bechnmark for http downloads over apache and Lighty.
Submitted by Webseiter (not registered) on Tue, 2008-10-14 13:37.
As for the lighttpd development seems to be relatively slow nginx seems to be quite popular these days. How about a comparison between those three?